Posted by: Sam Clifford | April 30, 2008

Starving Arts Students more than a stereotype

The PhD scholarship for a Humanities and Social Sciences student is $20,007, which is below both the industry award stipend (by about $6000) and the poverty line according to an article in today’s The Australian. It seems there’s more to the “starving postgrad student” stereotype than any notion of such students living a life of attending the theatre and drinking caramel lattes at trendy inner suburban cafés.

Yes, you can make the argument that the market for postgraduate degrees fluctuates as demand for such graduates changes and that there’s a supply side issue of the number of places universities are willing to offer but the fact remains that these people are researching and studying (often full time with very little time to work outside the university) to take home a pay packet which is below the poverty line. This isn’t unskilled labour, this is an intellectual marathon. A PhD, even in fields which might be described as “soft” sciences, is an immense amount of work which takes years to complete.

As long as there is society there is a need for people studying the humanities. Fields like gender studies, social psychology, feminist theory, socio-political trends, identity, etc. all have a contribution to make both to society at large and government policy in particular. If we’re going to have an education revolution and work on evidence-based policies, we need strong social sciences departments at universities.

Stuart Cunningham, Professor of Media and Communications at QUT, says that the Rudd government’s focus on maths and science (we’re still yet to see the money and resources) puts the Humanities at risk of not having the resources to educate the professional-managerial workers which are not only in demand but in growing demand. Graeme Hugo, a demographer with the University of Adelaide points out that Arts academia is characterised by an aging population and that many academics are reaching retiring age. Without PhD graduates to take on the research and lecturing load, universities are going to struggle to provide Cunningham’s professional-managerial workers. Quite a quandary indeed.

Responses

So true, Sam. There is very little of this by people outside this arena. I am fortunate (?) to be doing my PhD part- time supported by my husband, in education as it happens. A fellow education PhD recently got a scholarship, which means that she has to switch from part - time to full time study and give up her teaching job. I was congratulating her on getting a scholarship, (fewer and far between in the humanities) and she said “I don’t know what I am going to do, I don’t want to go back to living in poverty now that I’m used to a real [teacher's] wage”. So the upshot is its way better financially to be teaching in the secondary section than to be researching in the tertiary sector.

And it’s not like teachers are amongst the highest paid workers in the first place. My fiancee (who should be starting on her education blog any time now) is a final year education student who once entertained the idea of doing an Education PhD after a few years in the classroom. She’s passionate about education reform, integrating science and maths into everyday class, Indigenous education, etc. but I have a feeling she won’t want to take on further study if it means a substantial pay cut from an already meagre wage.

There’s a severe shortage of money for postgrads across just about every discipline and we’re going to struggle to maintain the standard of tertiary education (which will flow on to professional industries as teaching standards decline) across the nation without resorting to importing lecturers from other countries.

Thanks for your comments.

How depressing would it be if they had to start importing lecturers from other countries. In terms of that would reveal a gross mismanagement of our own intellectual resources (speaking as an intellectual resource!)
On another note, I just started my own blog yesterday and got here from Larvatus Prodeo and I have put a link to here from my blog. I hope that’s ok, I am new to this game.

That’s fine. I’ll return the favour.

I’ve not got anything against foreign academics coming to lecture if there’s a genuine shortage of experts in the field. Many of my Physics lecturers were Eastern European and really know their stuff. The problem really kicks in when you start having to hire academics to do things that we once did (and did well) and the field’s not on the cutting edge of human knowledge.

The “brain drain” is no doubt a cause of this and if we don’t find a way to keep our maths and science graduates in the country (say by funding more postgrad and research places and giving the CSIRO and BoS enough money to operate properly) then no amount of extra undergraduate targeted resources will fix the problem.

People who have expenses could find it difficult to live on $20,000 a year - but many people do survive on a scholarship quite ok - especially if there are opportunities to earn extra money e.g. tutoring or marking.

The argument here seems to be that there are external benefits coming from a person doing a humanities PhD and that potential PhD students cannot properly capture some of these benefits (allowing them to overcome any economic barriers to their doing the study).

This argument may have merit - I suggest it be fleshed out a lot more. People aren’t very receptive to complaints that a tax free $20,000 grant a year for three years isn’t enough.

Personally I think that scholarships should allow people to have the time to do the study - but I don’t think it should essentially pay for much more e.g. a mortgage.

Why only employ Australians to lecture? This would deny students and tertiary institutions access to other lecturers, some of whom may be much better than Australian lecturers.

Granted Sacha, and the tertiary sector is very international, and I don’t have a problem with that, a fair proportion of my undergrad lecturers were OS and my supervisor, as I do my PhD is from the USA. But I wouldn’t like under investment in the sector resulting in a brain drain as Sam mentioned.

As I said above; I have no problem with foreign academics per se. My problem is when we have let fundamental disciplines fall so far behind that we have no choice but to look overseas for lecturers.

Dr. Cunningham is good for a laugh if nothing else, given he was hardly uninvolved in the demise of QUT’s Humanities program. It seems rather hilarious that he’s now bemoaning the risks threatening Humanities education in universities. Hindsight. It seems to be kicking him in unpleasant places.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories