Posted by: Sam Clifford | May 1, 2008

Open Thread

Again, I’ve probably missed posting one of these for a while. Today, I’ll start with what I’m reading.

  • Gorbachev’s Memoirs
  • Robert Manne’s “Dear Mr Rudd”
  • Ken Knabb’s translation of the “Situationist International Anthology”
  • Anthony Giddens’ “The Third Way - Renewal of Social Democracy”


Clearly I’ve got a penchant for reading books about leftist reform, both radical and moderate. The Memoirs are a massive tome; I’m up to “Part II - Inside the Kremlin” which is about 1/5-1/4 of the way through the book and quite weighty. It’s clear that Gorbachev faced an uphill struggle against the established order within the party who were happy to let the union go to shit as long as they had their cushy Party-funded lifestyle.

Knabb’s translation of the Anthology is something I’m reading in bits and pieces; it’s a collection of essays, letters, journal articles, internal memoranda, etc. which deals with the idea of a radical social revolution aiming to overturn the established order in just about every aspect of life. Ideas like bringing about the destruction of religion lead to discussions on what to do with old churches, such as leaving them as museums, converting them to horror houses, leaving them as horror houses, ripping them down and replacing them with gardens or partially demolishing them to create urban ruins which can be enjoyed by society. Whether or not you agree with their conclusions, it’s an interesting take on things.

Giddens’ book on the Third Way is more a brief overview of the history of neo-liberalism and classical social democracy, outlining their failings and then attempting to build a vision of what new social democracy should look like and where it stands at the moment. It’s not a very thick book but it’s certainly interesting.

Reading anything good? Anything caught your eye in the news?

Responses

I’m reading three books, which is a lot for someone who usually doesn’t read any because there’s enough uni books to read.

I’m almost a third of the way through “The Fatal Shore” which is about the colonisation of Australia. It’s a very big book so it’s going on hold for a while.

I’m reading “Dreams From My Father” by Barack Obama. I thought it would be interesting since he wrote it before he became a Senator, and it doesn’t have the political adjustments to it (so he doesn’t hide the fact he tried drugs).

The third is “the 33 strategies of war”, which I thought was a military book but it is technically a self-help book for managers and CEOs. It’s a pretty interesting read on key military battles which are interpreted to use in your everyday life.

http://thisdevilsworkday.wordpress.com/

Luke, that last one sounds something like Sun Tzu for the Boardroom or The Prince: Middle Management Edition.

How’s the Obama book? I’m not as interested in Obama as I could be, although I do want him to win the nomination and the Presidency.

Well it actually references Sun Tzu and the Prince quite a lot. I think the author would probably describe it as a modern day art of war, and probably no more ethical than the Prince (from what I’ve heard about it).

The Obama book is actually pretty good. I tend to like biographies (the last one I read was by Motley Crue - very different to this one). He had a pretty interesting life given the different places he’s lived in (indonesia, hawaii etc) and i’m not quite halfway through it yet, so his political interests are only just beginning.

Oh and a side note, I want Obama to win too. Because he seems genuine and also because I did an assignment once comparing the leadership qualities/tactics etc. of Hilary Clinton to Joseph Stalin and there were remarkable similarities. Maybe I should write a post about it. Basically I’ve decided she’s evil.

I’m afraid to say I haven’t read a book in years, and when I do its rarely non fiction, though I have read Sun Tzu a few times.

This news story piqued my interest last week http://www.smh.com.au/text/articles/2008/04/27/1209234655625.html

I particularly liked Commander Pauline Storum’s defence of Guantanamo, I burst out laughing when I read it. It was brilliant. Provided of course that you ignore the minor detail of the US (like Australia) using its prison system as defacto mental institutions. According to her, Guantanamo is free to damage half of the predominantly sane abductees, to the point of developing a mental illness, before it’ll even be considered as a problem.

Zoltar, her invoking of mental health statistics in US prisons compared to Guantanamo probably fails to take into account that people have the mental problems before they get sent to US prisons whereas Gitmo breaks people.

Those who would try to defend places like Guantanamo either have no soul, no scruples or a boss breathing down their neck.

Sam, that was precisely the point I was trying to make.

Oh, well there you go.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories